8 Petrarch’s source is Pliny, Historia naturalia, tr. W.H.S. Jones (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1963), Book 29, 1-8; Petrarch makes repeated use of Pliny, see especially, the Invective, henceforth cited as ICM, I, 828; II, 868, 872; III, 912.
9 The classification of medicine as per mechanical art can be found in Hugh of St. 11; Petrarch refers esatto medicine as per mechanical art also mediante XII, 2, 454, 466, 473-4.
10 Fracassetti, Studio letterario vecchio, vol. 2, 242-3, translates verso passage not found in Bernardo’s edition: “Ecco volubilita di impiego, quasi anche inutilita della rimedio,” XII, 2.
The continuing popularity of the Conciliator is attested by a seventeenth-century sintesi, Conciliator enucleatus seu differentiarum philosophicarum et medicarum petri apponensis Compendium, Gregori Lorsti, acad
11 Peirce, “How onesto Make Our Ideas Clear,” Writings, vol. 3, 263-4: “The superiore of verso belief is the establishment of per habit, and different beliefs are distinguished by the different modes of action puro which they give rise.”
V. Nutton remarks that per good manuscript of Galen’s works was available at the papal trapu con 1353, John Caius and the Manuscripts of Galen, (Cambridge: Cambridge Philological Society, 1987), vol
12 On Petrarch and the dialecticians see Pietro Paolo Gerosa, Umanesimo umano del Petrarca; Influenza agostiniana, attinenze medievali (Turin: Distribuzione d’Erasmo, 1966), 208f. 13. Petrarch seems onesto collapse dialectic and logic; on this issue see Eleonore Stump, Dialectic and its Place mediante the Development of Medieval Logic (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989).
14 Petrarch is not above employing syllogizing, con deepest irony, of course; see ICM, III, 932: “Certe ego nunc risu et verecundia impedior sillogismum tibi tuo parem mittere, quo probem te vilissime servum rei. Quod urbanius possum dicam: sinon quod alio spectat, et ad aliud refertur, et propter aliud levante inventum, illi serviat oportet, ut tu vis. Ricetta autem asphyxia pecumian spectat et ad https://datingranking.net/it/military-cupid-review/ illam refertur et propter illam levante. Conclude, dyaletice: allora pecunie schiava levante.”
15 Petrarch also argues that the more necessary is not by that more noble: “Igitur putas necessitas artium nobilitatem arguat. Contra levante; alioquin nobilissimus artificum erit agricola; sutor quoque et pistor et estompe, si mactare desieris, in precio eritis,” ICM, III, 894-6; cf. III, 910.
16 “. . . the doctor had done nothing at all, nor could he have except what a loquacious dialectician, rich sopra boredom and lacking per remedies, can do”; “Medicum nil omnino vel fecisse, vel facere potuisse, nisi quod dialecticus loquax potest, taedii dives, inopsque remedii.”
18 I use the edition, Conciliator controversarium quae inter philosophos eet medicos versantur (Venice: apud Juntas, 1548). Nancy Siraisi’s colloque of d’Abano in Arts and Sciences at Padua; The Studium of Padua before 1350 (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1973), is excellent. D’Abano libretto the attack on him as Averroist by the Dominicans con Differentia 48; Nardi contests the notion of d’Abano as Averroist in “La dispensa dell’anima di nuovo la epoca delle forme posteriore Pietro d’Abano,” 1-17, and “Circa alle dottrine filosofiche di Pietro d’Abano,” durante Studi sulla dottrina aristotelica nel Veneto, I: Saggi sull’Aristotelismo padovano dal tempo XIV at XVI (Florence: Sansoni, 1958), 19-74. P. O. Kristeller makes the point that Petrarch’s opponents con the De sui ipsius et multorum ignorantia were probably Bolognese, not Paduans, con “Petrarch’s ‘Averroists’; Verso Note on the History of Aristotelianism con Venice, Padua, and Bologna,” Bibliotheque d’Humanisme et Renaissance, 14 (1952), 59-65. Giessena (Giessae: Casparus Chemlinus, 1621).
19 Lynn Thorndike, “Translations from the Greek by Pietro d’Abano,” Isis, 33 (1942), 649-53; see also V. Nutton, “Galen on Prognosis,” Corpus medicorum graecorum, 8.1.1 (1979), 27.
21 See the argument cited durante Differentia 3, (8r): “. . . medicari non oriente scientia subite: sed quidam actus et labor particularis, et de tali nulla oriente scientia . . . regulat con actu operandi particularem et tunc consequitor medicinae finis perfecte, quod ostenditur.”
